The PearPC wish list thread @ PearPC.net

Discuss PearPC's Development and any bugs you find here

Postby Jackal05 » Sat Aug 07, 2004 7:52 am

I would first try to run some video on ppc, then post this.
Right now there are higher priorities such as a faster pearpc, sound emulation, and native CD support (just one of the major goals). So you're going to have to stay tuned until future releases.
Of course if they finish sound emulation and accomplish faster speeds you could alway get a bit dirty and burn an ISO or something of your project, transfer it to the PC, and burn it from your PC.
Jackal05
Avid Helper
Avid Helper
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 11:22 pm

Postby Guest » Mon Aug 23, 2004 2:16 am

I tryed playing some movies in quicktime and doing some transitions with iMovie, and it wasn't too bad...

Playing the quicktime movie went about 20 or so frames per second (a guess) because I could only see slight flickering...

But playing the transitions from iMovie were Much slower, more like a slide show...

I was running 0.3pre on a Athlon XP 2600 with 256 Ram for mac (512 host), but I st=uck the screen res at abpout 1300*768 (or whatever the ACTUAL numbers are...

thewer ;)
Guest
 

Postby Jackal05 » Mon Aug 23, 2004 4:13 am

Actually, iDVD should and will work with other drives, the problem is -- even if you get everythng together -- PearPC does not support native CDs, meaning you cannot burn it. But I'm sure there is a way around this to somehow save it as an iso or something and later burn it on windows. I don't know.
Jackal05
Avid Helper
Avid Helper
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 11:22 pm

Postby Jackal05 » Mon Aug 23, 2004 7:13 pm

Couldn't you at least open a new topic? Razz
Anyways, consider the following my christmass wishlist Razz
-> Sound emulation
-> Easier networking
-> Faster emulation
-> Firewire and USB support
-> Native CD support
-> A bootable version that can be booted into when turning on the computer (use of grub for multi-booting)

I'm sure most of these are already priorities and are being planned.
Jackal05
Avid Helper
Avid Helper
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 11:22 pm

Postby Guru3 » Tue Aug 24, 2004 4:37 am

[quote="Jackal05":b9f9f71744]
Easier networking
[/quote:b9f9f71744]It's not a matter of making it easier- it's already pretty easy. It's more a matter of making it fool proof. Because of all the different versions of OpenVPN for example, it's just confusing, but I wouldn't saay that it needs to be easier.
Guru3
PearPC.net staff
PearPC.net staff
 
Posts: 2187
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 1:37 pm

Postby prasys » Tue Aug 24, 2004 5:34 am

Yeah , its pretty easy to network it...

Well , emulating CD-Burner/DVD-Burner would be hard...

Firstly , they should try to fix Video issues and other common issues. Thats all
Bastila Shan: The Jedi do not believe in killing their prisoners. No one deserves execution, no matter what their crimes.
prasys
PearPC.net staff
PearPC.net staff
 
Posts: 2357
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:48 am
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Postby Thoreaux » Tue Aug 24, 2004 2:29 pm

[quote="Guru3":da330af82f]
It's not a matter of making it easier- it's already pretty easy.
[/quote:da330af82f]
For gurus, perhaps. But the fact that you personally find it easy is irrelevant.

If you look at commercial virtual machine software like Virtual PC and VMWare, setting up networking there is simply a case of ticking a box in the configuration screen - and it automatically works with firewalls, routers, dialups, basically whatever your configuration.

Reading the forums here, I see people installing OpenVPN (whatever that is) to get at something called a TAP driver (ditto), fiddling around with bridging (ditto), NAT (ditto), and proxies (ditto), changing IP address settings (ditto)... I'm sorry, but to the average computer user, [b:da330af82f]this is not easy[/b:da330af82f].

Commercial emulators are easy to configure, PearPC (like similar OSS projects like coLinux) is not easy to configure. That is a simple statement of fact, not a criticism. I deduce that easy networking is difficult to program, which is fine. I'm not demanding it be made easier, because I know I have no right to demand anything from people who are already giving up their free time to write this wonderful program for free. But I certainly don't want to see "easy networking" taken off the TO DO list because the experts mistakenly think that everyone finds this stuff as easy as they do.
Thoreaux
 

Next

Return to PearPC Development

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest